
In August, I moved back to Lower Alabama to discern the best seminary for me. I was very torn. I looked at 4 or so possibilities and they were all related to my struggles in theology.
I had visited Wesley Theological Seminary in Jackson, MS in the summer of 1993 after I had heard MacArthur but before I left the process to become a Methodist minister. I still had plans on being a Methodist minister. Wesley is a seminary in the Wesleyan tradition and is not tied to any Methodist group per se. I was also considering Asbury Theological Seminary. Both are considered “conservative” Methodist seminaries and either would have been a good choice for me as a Methodist.
At this point, I had already become disillusioned with some things that I observed in the Methodist Church, particularly with the lack of doctrinal fortitude and women’s ordination. This coupled with my “new” “discoveries” led me to start to consider other options.
I started considering Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia and San Diego because these are the bastions of Calvinistic thought. I made visits to both and came away impressed with both.
While I was in Philadelphia, I had heard about Philadelphia Theological Seminary from a friend, so I paid them a visit. This seminary is the seminary of the Reformed Episcopal Church. The REFORMED EPISCOPAL Church. I thought that I had found what I had been searching for. When I read the name I comprehended Calvinists with a Prayer Book. The “Reformed” in the name actually stood for reconstituted or reorganized, but I did find that most of the members are Calvinists.
I spent a year studying Calvinism and liturgy, so I came to the conclusion that Philadelphia Theological Seminary was where I needed to be. Also, the Dean of the seminary was a prominent theologian in Calvinist circles. I had finally made my decision, kinda.
I moved to Philly in the summer of 1995 and stayed there for several months, but I never attended the seminary. The dean who was at the seminary had moved to a seminary in Shreveport, LA, and this really changed the culture of Philadelphia Theological, so I left and moved back home.
After moving back home, I worked for several months until I could move to California and go to Westminster Seminary. I had decided that I could get a Calvinistic, Reformed education and attend a Reformed Episcopal Church, which was in Anaheim, and supplement my education accordingly.
I continued to read and study some of the arguments that I had heard from that Catholic theologian. I continued to struggle with the answers that I was getting from my reading. Also, I had two classes that really changed my perspective on Catholicism The first class was the Pentateuch which was taught by Meredith Kline from Gordon-Conwell. During this class, Dr. Kline told us of the Norman Shepard controversy at Westminster East (in Philadelphia) in 1963. Dr. Shepard was a professor at Westminster in Philly and he questioned the classical Reformed teaching on justification by faith alone. The following is an excerpt from a responsorial paper written by Dr. R. Scott Clark:
"This is what is disturbing about Shepherd's account of James 2. He denies the classic Reformed view (recently ably defended by Prof. Venema in the pages of the Outlook) that James is concerned not to juxtapose faith and works per se, but rather a dead faith v. a living faith. Shepherd's exegesis of James 2 (explaining Abraham's obedience) is much closer to the classic Roman view than it is to the Reformed. Here, p. 16 he clearly makes faith and works two instruments of justification. One sees the same approach on p.17 where Shepherd does not interpret Abraham's obedience as "demonstrative" of his justification by grace alone, through faith alone, but rather as constitutive or instrumental in Abraham's justification. This is a serious error in theology."
Dr. Kline discussed the “New Perspective” openly with us in class. He explained the pros and cons of Shepard’s ideas, and for me, I found myself agreeing with Shepard. I knew that Luther said that the Reformation stands or falls on the Doctrine of Justification by Faith Alone and for me, it was starting to fall.
There were three things that were extremely important for me to understand and believe so that I could know with some certainty that Catholicism was either right or wrong. One was whether the Reformed was right about justification. By the time I left Westminster in June of 1996, I knew the Reformed were wrong. The second was on the Doctrine of Sola Scriptura, or the Reformed view that the authority of Christianity was based solely on the Bible. The last, which is connected to the Bible alone thought was also authority. IS the Bible alone our authority or did Christ leave behind something that would guide the Church. In other words, were the Catholics right about this, too? Did Christ, leave behind a magisterium and even a successor to Christ in the seat of Peter?
My second quarter at Westminster I took a class from Dr. Edmund Clowney, the first president of Westminster Seminary in California and a stalwart of the Reformed faith. The class was the Doctrine of the Church and our text book was his book that he had written on the subject. This was the class that I thought I needed to convince myself of Reformed teaching.
I had read the argument that when Christ gave Peter the keys to the Kingdom and promised to build His Church on the Rock in Matthew 16:15-19 and that Christ had in mind Isaiah 22:20-24. Since, Christ is going to sit on the throne of David, his kingdom is the fulfillment of the Davidic covenant from Psalm 2. In Isaiah 22, David speaking to his royal cabinet removes the keys from the head of his cabinet and makes another the head by giving him the power to bind and loose that comes with the keys. Read more about this argument
here.
I approached Dr. Clowney with this argument. It was obvious to me that he had never heard it. When I asked him what he thought he said, “That is wrong.” I waited a few more moments for him to elaborate. He looked at me again and said, “It’s just wrong.”
I knew then that what I was looking for what not the Reformed faith. So I left Westminster and decided to finish my education at Cranmer Theological House in Shreveport, LA. And the plot thickens.